My Two Cents: Zodiac
I normally don't go to the movies at this time of year. Part of the
reason why is because I'm still exhausted from the previous Oscar
race. Mostly, though, it's because the movies released between January
and March tend to, well, suck. Case and point: Because I Said So, a
shrill, by the numbers romcom that my sneaky friends duped me into
seeing.
But every so often a tiny diamond emerges from the rough. It happened
last year with Spike Lee's bank robber flick "Inside Man", which
earned Lee some of his best reviews and box office numbers to date.
Now, another gem has been found, this time by way of "Zodiac," David
Fincher's psychological thriller about the unsolved murders of the
Zodiac killer.
Despite a number of hits, Fincher has remained relatively under the
radar. And while "Zodiac" won't do much for his career awards wise,
it's nevertheless a testament to his consistency behind the camera. At
nearly 3 hours, Fincher dives deep into the case in a way that's both
engaging and down right scary. In fact, certain scenes are such a mind
fuck that become reminiscent of great thrillers like "The Silence of
the Lambs."
Of course, on the whole "Zodiac" is nowhere near as good as Demme's
Oscar-winning masterpiece. While scary, "Zodiac" can sometimes feel a
little tedious. Also, the film covers a huge chunk of time with little
makeup or costume change, which might confuse some. But it's still a
genuinely smart and well crafted movie, and in a season where films
like "Norbit" and "Wild Hogs" are hogging the box office, that's all
you can really hope for.
No comments:
Post a Comment